I saw a few more to add to this list of great lines et al.
This one comes from my North Connection again, but via Sassy 'n Shit (a moniker I think is awesome).
Your heart is the hardest thing to convince when it's time to let someone go.
I saw a few more to add to this list of great lines et al.
Your heart is the hardest thing to convince when it's time to let someone go.
As anyone who reads this blog will know, I love reposting content that hits me deeply in my soul from a Twitter user I follow (see more HERE)
Today's are poignant and powerful as well.
First from Skywatcher is this one on ghosts:
Some people, although living and breathing, must remain ghosts, unreachable, by their own choosing.
As you all know I glommed onto a Twitter account with some terrific, and poetic content, (see more of it HERE) that every now and then I like to repost and share because some of them hit me.
I can't save you. I don't even want to. I spend and inordinate amount of energy just to be able to function in this dysfunctional world. If you can't meet me half way then we have nothing. I won't let you drown both of us.
This next one, from Jess, is simple, straightforward, and powerful as well:
Silence screams the loudest answers.
Evershade, evershades, ever shade, ever shades, shades of Betsy
Several on soulmates today.
I saw one that caught my eye by Jasmine. She wrote:
Soulmates always find each other.
I agreed. Or I like to think I do. But it made This is Fine write:
Do soulmates even exist?
I've been posting lately to the Ever Shades label (see here) and really it's become a holding place for all those little bon mots that I can't put anywhere else.
You cannot change them by loving them harder.
Too true. Sometimes you love them by leaving them alone. Maybe they come back. Often they don't.
I'm not sure if this is the author's first novel or not, but it reads like one. There are some interesting ideas, and the writing is grammatically sound and free of errors, but there is a lot of telling the reader what's happening.
This book and the author's writing tends to lead the reader feeling like he is outside the action just looking in, rather than an integral part of the book and the writing. There are few things better than feeling as though you, as a reader are a part of the book and the writing, and you're on a roller coaster, going up and down with the main characters, being taken away.
The author's writing doesn't bring the reader to that place. Instead it keeps you at arm's length. I wish it was more engaging because it's smacks of Neil Ferguson's Snowcrash, a book that I loved. I look forward to more from this author, but this wasn't what I was hoping for.
Once more in the Ever Shade label, a simple yet long one. Spoke to me. Maybe to you too.
That one hit me.
Evershade, evershades, ever shade, ever shades, shades of Betsy
I've fallen in love with these Ever Shade posts (see here), and really enjoy being on the lookout for new ones to post each week. Here's this weeks sample:
This first one comes by way of "austere" and she says:
Asking yourself if their feelings were real, will destroy your heart.
Whenever I review a book I try to limit it to several things, the author’s intent, the writing style, the mechanics, and the overall story. On two of these, Qatarina Wanders fails.
That being said, the writing is solid. The mechanics and the style aren’t all together bad, I just wish I could give a damn about the story and the characters. The author tries to instill a sense of mystery and intrigue but fails completely enough that I had to force myself to keep turning pages. Worse? I didn’t like the main character at all. This is always the worst aspect for me. I want to involve myself in the main character’s life, I want to care. Instead I wanted nothing to do with the main character. I wanted her only to finish up quickly and move on so I could as well. And the intrigue? The mystery? I didn’t care.
There are some good things, but for me it wasn’t enough to overcome the bad.